Many of the UK scientific research centers, which were set up
during World War 2 to develop advanced defense systems, continued in
operation after the war had finished.
The Radar Research Establishment at Great Malvern in Worcestershire,
was one of these research centers where the initial development work
on radar was progressing towards the development of guided
weaponry.
An emerging problem with these research centers was the
communications gap between the scientific minds who were working on
the theoretical aspects of the newly emerging technologies and the
engineers who had to put these theoretical ideas into practice.
To plug this communications gap, a special college - The College of
Electronics - was set up in the middle of the research center at
Great Malvern, to train selected students to provide the
communication link between scientists and engineers: to span the all
important gap between theory and practice.
I was fortunate enough to have been chosen to be in the first group
of students chosen for this unique educational experiment and
embarked upon an amazing five year education. Fifteen of us were
taught, by the scientists themselves, all the newest theory and
practical applications which had emerged from the frantic war time
research.
To a boy of just sixteen years of age, the research establishment was
a place of wonder. Two rooms of one laboratory contained nothing else
but banks of glass thermionic valves. This was "TREACLE", one of the
first electronic computers in the world.
In another laboratory a "nest" of wires surrounded the "egg" of a
giant magnet where they were experimenting with the spin resonance of
atoms. Somewhere else a magnetron was pumping high frequency radio
waves through a maze of rectangular wave guides and in another
building a model factory, made from Mechano parts, was purifying
germanium to make transistors.
I spent time in many of these laboratories during my education at the
research establishment, but, three projects were to have a particular
influence on my later life.
The first of these was associated with my spell with the computer
"TREACLE". When I first met the chief scientist responsible for the
computer division I was ushered into a maniacally untidy laboratory
where a small wizened man in a white lab coat was staring intently at
a revolving spherical network of strands of straw which appeared to
be suspended from a glass rod.
It turned out that the straw sphere was not directly connected to the
glass rod, but, was being held by the feet of a small black beetle
which was glued to the bottom of the glass rod. With great excitement
the head of the computer division alternatively waved black and white
cards in front of the beetle causing the rotation of the straw sphere
to change direction.
To my surprise, this eminent scientist then started to draw boxes on
a nearby black board and proceeded to explain how this experiment was
giving him clues as to how the beetles brain was responding to
environmental cues and causing it to move in a particular direction.
In a few minutes more the scientist had progressed on to explain the
electronic circuitry for simulating a simple biological learning
mechanism.
From that moment on I was conscious of the possibility that
electronic circuitry could simulate the workings of the brain.
Much of the work of the research establishment was actively engaged
in the development of the, then, newly emerging weapons or war:
guided weaponry. Heat seeking missile heads were mocked up on lab
benches and antenna would track you around the room if you walked in
with a lighted cigarette. It was in these labs that I first became
interested in feedback mechanisms, automatic control, servo systems
and that whole area of system theory. They seemed to hold a peculiar
fascination for me.
The oddest laboratory I worked in appeared, at first sight, to be the
most boring place in the whole establishment. The work consisted of
placing finished electronic assemblies into ovens, into freezers and
onto vibration tables for days at a time. Then each component was
laboriously tested to see if it was still working properly.
"Is this to test how long equipment will last in combat conditions?",
I'd asked when I first went into the lab.
"No, it's to see how many duplications of the equipment have to be
taken on a mission to be reasonably sure that there isn't a fatal
breakdown", was the reply.
The subsequent understanding of the subtle difference between these
two paradigms was my conceptual breakthrough in the understanding of
probability theory which would eventually lead me into the incredible
worlds of game theory, evolution and genetic algorithms.
So it was, in the early 1960's, that I found myself at the birth of
all the science and technologies which were to emerge and dominate
technology for the rest of the century.
Perhaps it is this unusual education which accounts for some of my
unconventional paradigms?
[Index]
[Next -Wealth creation]
[Back - The background]
Peter Small August
1996
Email:
peter@petersmall.com
Version 1.00
©Copyright 1996 Peter Small